Great explorers, archeologists, and historians
have described Kurdistan geographically, historically, and socially
as one of the richest
lands on Earth. With its magnificent geography, ancient history,
and earliest empires, Kurdistan justifies what many have come to
describe as the Fertile Crescent, fruit basket of Middle East, and
Cradle of civilization. Kurdistan is where for the first time many
things happened in the history of humanity. It is where for the first
time humans started cultivating, domesticating, and settling. Flourishing
with flowing rivers, Kurdistan is where the first villages, cities,
and empires in the world were established. From the inventions of
early arts to the first system of writing, Kurdistan can be called
the national Museum of Humanity. Every place in Kurdistan is a piece
that completes the entire archeological site. As stated by Professor
Mehrdad Izady, the 9th edition of Encyclopedia Britannica defines
Kurdistan as the only place in Middle East that “…deserves
a more careful scrutiny and promises a richer harvest to the antiquarian
explorer than the lands inhabited by the Kurds, from Erzeroum to
Kirmanshah.”
Although these reasons verify why such places deserve to be reserved
not only for the people of Kurdistan, but also for the entire world;
the controlling states of Kurdistan have tried to build a dam in
every river in Kurdistan and the process is never-ending. For centuries,
Kurdistan has provided the greater Middle East with large amounts
of crops, fruits, and wheat. However, today the governments of
the controlling states want Kurdistan to become a power station
and provide them with cheap electricity by building some of the
largest dams in the world. It is well-known that every dam built
drowns large parts of river basin. In the case of Kurdistan, the
valleys were home to some of the earliest and most ancient kingdoms
in the world that have been preserved until recent times.
While dams have many advantages for a state
and its people such as providing electricity, consistent water
supply, and agricultural
land; they also have many disadvantages including the displacement
of thousands of people, their homes and properties, and large communities
that may or may never be compensated for their cultural and historical
losses. Even though the controlling states of Kurdistan have been
rushing the creation of these dams to provide for their needs,
they have been careless when it comes to studying and recording
the archeological and historical facts of these places before drowning
them and losing them forever. After the second half of the 20th
century, Iraq was rushing to create a number of dams on the rivers
of Kurdistan to supply its demands in other Iraqi cities like Baghdad.
The Iraqi Regime was not concerned about the great potential losses
of Kurdish history and culture in these places where the process
of drowning lands was faster than any possible archeological effort
to save what could have been saved. For example, the creation of
Dokan Dam on the lesser Zab destroyed most of Raniya plains, including
Shemshara Mountain, which was home to some of the most prehistoric
civilizations in the world. Professor Mehrdad Izady explains the
flooding of Raniya plain as, “…forever eliminating
the chance of uncovering any direct information about those two
kingdoms [Simurrum and Kharkhar] from the Hurrian phase of Kurdish
history.”
When the creation of any dams is proposed, governments of the
controlling states of Kurdistan have promised agricultural development
and power supply for the nourishment of undeveloped Kurdish cities.
The outcomes however, have usually not been what these governments
claimed they would be. For instance, when the Southeastern Anatolian
Project in Turkey (better known as the GAP project) was proposed,
the Turkish government made claims that there would be great advantages
to the development of Kurdish cities. The outcomes however proved
to be less true. The negative effects on the productivity of the
nearby farms were much higher in comparison to the proposed benefits
of the GAP project.
The controlling states of Kurdistan have also
come to use the creation of these dams to control Kurdistan and
destroy all the
archeological evidence that prove the existence of Kurds in Kurdistan
for thousands of years. As though the Dokan, Darbandikhan, and
Hamrin Dams had not destroyed enough history, the Iraqi Ba’ath
Regime planned the creation of Bekhma Dam near the well-organized
Barzan region in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Their plan was
to divide Southern Kurdistan by the creation of yet another dam
on the Greater Zab. Their goal was to politically and militarily
control one of the regions known for its resistance to the government.
As part of their preparation for Bekhma Project in the 1980s, they
destroyed thousands of villages and displaced thousands of more
people. The completion of Bekhma Dam was stopped after Iraq’s
invasion of Kuwait.
Today however, fifteen years after the liberation of Southern
Kurdistan from the Iraqi dictatorship, the Kurdistan Regional Government
with the help of allied forces and the international community
have begun to rebuild the destroyed lands and finish the incomplete
projects including Bekhma Dam. This Dam is planned to be the fourth
largest dam in the world. It is considered to make 1300 MW of electricity
that will provide for most of the necessities in Southern Kurdistan
including power and water. With the liberation of Kurdistan and
its resources from the control of the central government, the creation
of a grand dam, such as Bekhma Dam, could become a turning point
in the history of dam creation in Kurdistan.
Bekhma Dam is again a reality for the people residing near great
Zab. After their return from the first displacement of the 1980s,
the people of these regions will once again have to leave their
homes. This time however, their move will be permanent. So the
cost for creating this dam whether completed by the Iraqi government
or the Kurdish Regional Government is the same. The only difference
will be the distribution of its resources. When prior dams were
built in Kurdistan, their resources were usually distributed among
the more populated and developed cities of the region outside of
Kurdistan. This time however, the test will be whether or not the
Kurdish Regional Government will prioritize its resources to accomplish
the most for Kurdistan.
If the Kurdish Regional Government is successful in the distribution
of the Bekhma Dam resources locally, the needs of Kurdistan will
be provided and will help it to become less dependent of the central
government. It will also prevent the damming of other rivers in
Kurdistan in the near future, which will maintain the statues of
Kurdistan as the Cradle of civilization rather than a Power station.
Aryan
Akrayi is Vice President of the Kurdish American Youth Organization <a.akrayi@kurdyouth.org> |